Well since I am the youngest out of my family, I do not agree with these findings because I am not that social, I'm not laid back I'm pretty aggressive at times. I am comical/ entertaining at times. I am conventional, I have a lot of expectations for myself. I take a lot of risks thus most of the time I always get hurt in the process of entertaining myself, in which brings me joy knowing that I have a weird sense of humor, or you can say a painful sense of humor, which totally sets me a said from my brothers and sister and father/mother authority figures.
As it turns out my brother Adam is the middle child and me and him get into strenuous arguments almost every time that we hang out, younger child of the family are most likely to rebel against the norm of family structure.
The middle child is most likely going to be influential towards their younger siblings, if and when that doesn't work, they but heads, thus when siblings rivalry, they continuously fight amongst each other, thus making each other have new found hatred for one another.
There's a point when sibling rivalry goes to a whole new level when it goes from normal to absolutely destructerous towards their well being. Some say that the oldest child gets all the attention, then the middle child gets neglected, then then youngest child gets more attention so still the middle child is neglected in the norm of the family structure this is completely normal. So the question that you got to ask yourself is whether are you oldest, middle, or the youngest and which norm do you believe, and which stand point will best suit you and your life social status. Because I believe that I truly am not the social standard norm of the youngest birth order. Do I believe the youngest is more acceptable to be more risk taking? Is it true that the youngest is more social able? Is it true that the middle child is neglected from receiving attention from parents? Is it true that the oldest gets all if not most of the attention, from parents? truthfully to answer this question, yes it is most likely true with most families, because the oldest is most likely to become something important, the youngest is more of a rebel and social able, the middle child is more or less the child that tries to influence their siblings, and are most likely to be acceptable to receive less attention from their parents.
No comments:
Post a Comment